BIAYA TRANSAKSI DALAM PERSPEKTIF MANAJEMEN ADMINISTRASI (Studi Kuantitatif Layanan Instansi Pemerintah di Indonesia)

Isi Artikel Utama

Rusdin Nawi

Abstrak

The research aim to know the transaction cost in administration management prospective consist of the government cost and market cost with suitable the government service in administration management prospective.


The number of respondent that use in this research about 337 respondents of staff from syariah banking institution in South Sulawesi Province. Analysis model which has been used in this research are quantitative descriptive and Structural Equation Model (SEM) by used AMOS programme.The result of government in applied of transaction cost have affect by the government cost suitable with routine cost, development cost, human resource cost and facility cost suitable with information, administration, operational and technology costs in applied the suitable of service with principle, accountable, leadership, productivity and service
quality. The appointment of market cost have positive toward transaction cost for several activity or job program in government scope. 


The government instance have responsibility in appointment of transaction cost with give of propose planning suitable with need of
government in applied of information, administration, operational and technology cost which affected toward suitable of service. Although the transaction cost in specific occured with the transaction cost particularly relate with cost transaction because the government cost require to suitable with transaction cost. The suitable of service principle which result from transaction cost such as the implementation of principle, accountable, leadership, productivity and service quality. In all of to see that the causal relation between variable have causal correlation in positive and significant  with probability value (P)  < 0,05 and CR (t-value) < 1,96.

Rincian Artikel

Cara Mengutip
Rusdin Nawi. (2014). BIAYA TRANSAKSI DALAM PERSPEKTIF MANAJEMEN ADMINISTRASI (Studi Kuantitatif Layanan Instansi Pemerintah di Indonesia) . Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasita’, 4(1), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.47030/administrasita.v4i1.85
Bagian
Articles

Referensi

Black, Shafritz, 2007. Classics of Public Administration, USA: Harcourt Brace & Company.

Gibson, Kendall, 1996. The Process of Network Administration. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Hellriegel, Henault, 1998. Managing of Organization. New York,NY: Prentice Hall.

Helmert, Marcel, 2008. Service Autonomy in Concept and Theory. Published by American Press, USA.

Hens,John & Gitto, E.A. Russell, 2008. Administration Management, Mc Grow-Hill, inc.,Singapura.

Herlind, Harold, 2008. Power and Society of Public Administration. Singapore: Singapore Press Holding.

Hermanto, 2008. Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik. (Penyunting: Darwin Muhadjir). Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.

Jackson, J.H, Morgan,CP, dan Paolillo,J, 1978. Organization Theory, A Macro Perspective for management, Prentice-Hall, New York.

James, Perchy, 2008. Implementation of Service Administration Public. London: Sage.

Jeffrey, Malic, 2008. How to Managed of Organization Effeciveness. New Jersey, Prentice Hall.

Jingrat, Korten, 2007. Strategic Public Administration. Public Managers Forum.

Joan, Macraully, 2008. Organization Theory in Public Administration. New York, John Wiley and Sons.

Joseph, Samson, 2007. The Network Service of Public. Published by Prentice Hall Ohio Press.

Josephina, Knoke, 2005. Alternatif of Public Service. London: Sage Publication.

Keban, Yeremis T, 2004. Indikator Kinerja Pemda: Pendekatan Manajemen dan Kebijakan. Yogyakarta (Makalah).

-----------------------, 2005. Enam Dimensi Strategis Administrasi Publik: Konsep, Teori dan Isu. Jakarta: Gava Media.

Ketll, J.M, 2009, Organization Policy and Strategic Management. Hinsdale, III, Dryden Press.

Khasmir, 2007. Pelayanan Publik untuk Administrasi Pemerintahan. Jakarta: Grassindo.

Khun, Hudson, 2006. Comparison of Administration Theories. Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 45 No. 4.

Klein, Gareth R, 2000, Organizational Administration Theory:Text and Cases. Addition Wesley Publishing Company, A & M University, Texas.

Lewis, James. P, 2009. Public Policy: An Evolution Administ- ration Approach. Belmont: Wadswort.

Listyadi, P, 2006. Pengantar Kebijakan Publik. (Penyunting Ricky Ismanto). Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Lukman, Sampara, 2009. Manajemen Kualitas Pelayanan. Jakarta: STIA-LAN Press.

Malay, Jorgy, 2009. The Structure of Unstructured Decision Processed. Prentice Hall, Ohio University.

Moore, Poppy, 2004. Organization Management. New York : Foresman and Company.

Muchlas, Zainal, 2009. Kebijakan Publik. Jakarta: Yayasan Pancur Siwah.

Mustopadijaja, 2007. Paradigmaparadigma Pembangunan Administrasi dan Manajemen Pembangunan. Makalah dibacakan pada Temu Kaji Posisi dan Ilmu Administrasi dan Manajemen Pembangunan Nasional. Diselenggarakan oleh

LAN RI.

Namara, Crozier, 2010. The Administration Phenomenon. London: Tavistock.

Osborne et al, 2007. Implementation Theory and Practice : Tward a third generation, Glenview,

Illinois, New York : Foresman and Company.

Pasolong, Harbani, 2007. TeoriAdministrasi Publik. PenerbitAlfabeta, Bandung.

Quinn, Robert E, 2005. A CompetingValues Approach to Organization Effectivities. New York:Addison Wesley.

Rakhmat, Sartono, 2009. MemahamiGood Governance dalam Kemitraan dengan Publik. Jakarta:PT. Grafindo Persada.