PENGARUH PERILAKU KEPEMIMPINAN DAN KOMPENSASI TERHADAP KEPUASA DAN KINERJA PEGAWAI PEMERINTAH KABUPATEN SINJAI
Main Article Content
Abstract
These research aims to analysis the direct effect of transformational leadership, transactional leadership and compensation toward satisfaction, to analysis the direct effect of transformational leadership, transactional leadership and compensation toward performance, to analysis the satisfaction toward performance in direct effect, and to analysis the indirect effect of transformational leadership, transactional leadership and compensation toward performance through satisfaction. The research applied in Regional Government Sinjai Regency with total sample as amount 200 respondent based on Slovin formulation. Data from questioner to analysis with Structural Equation Model used of AMOS 18 computer programs.
The result of research to found the transformational leadership in direct have positive and insignificant affected toward satisfaction. That mean the transformational leadership which oriented on vision, mision, expect, intelegence and attention have applied, unless insignificant to sufficient of satisfaction by employee. The transformational leadership in direct have positive and insignificant toward performance. The transformation leadership which applied cannot achieve of performance in maximal as well as through input, process, output and outcome. The transformational leadership indirect have positive and insignificant toward performance through satisfaction. That mean the transformational leadership cannot sufficient of satisfaction and increasing of performance, so insignificant indirect it. Compensation in direct have positive and significant toward performance. That mean the compensation it by employee as the esteem which get contribution in increasing of performance suitable of input, proses, output and outcome.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Burns, T., 2007. Lecture Notes Dermatologi. Jakarta: Penerbit. Erlangga.
Dessler, G, 2000. Human Resources Management, Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Faturrahman, 2011. Manajemen Sumber daya Manusia. Yogyakarta, Universitas Gajahmada.
Handoko, T. Hani, 2001, Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia, Penerbit Andi,Yogyakarta
Kotter, 2003. Manajemen ... Panduan Riset Perilaku Konsumen, Jakarta: PT Pustaka Gramedia. Utama.Yukl, 1998
Locander. 2002, “Leader Behaviour Impact on Staff Nurse Empowerment, Job Tension and Work Effectiveness”, Journal of Nursing Administration, No. 5, p.28-39.
Luthans. 2001. The human organization: Its management and value. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Mangkunegara, A.A. Anwar Prabu. 2001. Perilaku dan Prestasi kerja Organisasi. PT. Refika Aditama – Bandung
Metcalf dan Eddy, 2000. Waste Water Engineering. Mc Graw Hill International Edition Civil Engineering Series. New York.
Muhlis, 2012. Educational Leadership (Mewujudkan Efektivitas Kepemimpinan Pendidikan). Malang: UIN Malang Press.
Nawawi, 2003. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi Revisi : Bumi Aksara
Nurtjahjani. 2008. Pengaruh Kompensasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Di PT PLN (Persero) APJ. Jakarta. PT. Bumi Aksara.
Tohardi, Ahmad. 2002. Pemahaman Praktis Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Universitas Tanjung Pura, Bandung. Mandar Maju.
Robbins, Stepen, 2007, Perilaku Organisasi. Terj: Benyamin Molan. New Jersey Prentice Hall, Inc.
Widodo, Joko 2010, Good Governance Telaah Dari Dimensi kuntabilitas, Kontrol Birokrasi Pada Era Desentralisasi Dan Otonomi Daerah, Insan Cendekia, Surabaya.
Wiryanto. 2004. Pengantar Ilmu Komunikasi. Jakarta: PT.Grasindo.