Strategies for Transitioning Toward an Inclusive Smart Village: A Study of Damar Makmur Village, East Kotawaringin Regency

Main Article Content

Afrizal Afrizal
Sadar Sadar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the readiness level of Damar Makmur Village in implementing digital governance, identify the gap between digitalization policies and the existing social and infrastructural conditions, and formulate a transition strategy toward an inclusive and sustainable Smart Village. This research employs a qualitative descriptive approach, with data collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation involving village officials and community members as service users. The findings indicate that the village’s readiness remains partial, characterized by initial digitalization initiatives that are not yet supported by adequate human resource capacity and technological infrastructure. Furthermore, a significant gap is identified in the form of low digital literacy among the community and limited access to technology, which may lead to social exclusion. Based on these findings, the study proposes a transition strategy consisting of capacity building, infrastructure development, and gradual integration of digital public services. The study highlights that successful implementation of a digital village depends not only on technological availability but also on social readiness and institutional capacity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Afrizal, A., & Sadar, S. (2026). Strategies for Transitioning Toward an Inclusive Smart Village: A Study of Damar Makmur Village, East Kotawaringin Regency . Journal of Government Insight, 6(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.47030/jgi.v6i1.1175
Section
Articles

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Edwards III, G. C. (1980). Implementing public policy. Congressional Quarterly Press.

Fitriani, R., & Nurmandi, A. (2020). Public sector innovation through e-Government: Evidence from Indonesian local governments. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 10(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v10i2.16882

Hapsari, D., & Raharjo, M. (2021). Evaluating digital governance implementation in regional public services: Case of Yogyakarta City. Jurnal Administrasi Publik Indonesia, 15(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.20473/japi.v15i1.2021

Indrajit, R. E. (2018). Manajemen e-Government di Indonesia: Strategi dan implementasi. Grasindo.

Kamaruddin, M., & Noor, M. (2022). Assessing the impact of e-Government on public service delivery in Southeast Asia. International Journal of e-Government and Policy, 8(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGP.2022010103

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Napitupulu, D., Soegoto, E. S., & Hidayanto, A. N. (2017). E-Government implementation model in Indonesia: A case study. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 7(3), 903–910. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.7.3.1950

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Rahmawati, S., & Nugroho, L. (2022). Citizen satisfaction and digital literacy in e-Government services in Indonesia. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik dan Manajemen, 11(3), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.21831/jkpm.v11i3.2022

Rokhman, A. (2011). E-Government adoption in developing countries: The case of Indonesia. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 2(5), 228–236.

Setiyono, B., & Sari, M. N. (2021). Barriers and challenges of e-Government implementation in Indonesia: A local government perspective. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, 18(2), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.20476/jia.v18i2.2021

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

United Nations. (2022). United Nations e-government survey 2022: The future of digital government. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

Van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press.

World Bank. (2023). Digital government readiness assessment: Indonesia country report. World Bank Group.