Partnership Pattern in Bali Cattle Risk Management in Purification Cluster Area
Article Sidebar
risk management,
partnership,
sharing,
clustering
Main Article Content
Abstract
Agricultural businesses, including beef cattle farming, are prone to risks and losses. Partnerships provide many benefits and reduce the risk of business losses through market assurance, added value, and an increased portfolio of productive assets. The Bali cattle cluster is a place of centralized development in cattle breeding to enhance high competitiveness. The study aims to build a partnership model for managing the risk of the Bali cattle business in the Bali cattle purification cluster. The research used a survey method with a descriptive qualitative approach. The results showed two partnership models in the research location: the partnership of the livestock company and the traditional partnership. Business cooperation is established in partnership with farmers by dividing profits among 50% farmers, 45% companies, and 5% farmer-livestock groups. As for traditional partnerships, farmers and owners get 50% of the profits each. So, the two business models of beef cattle farming have advantages and disadvantages. The partnership system has a good impact on farmers in managing their business risks because farmers feel helped by these two partnerships in the research location, especially for farmers who still have minimal business capital in the Bali cattle business. Future research will be maximized if it increases the number of respondents and the size of the research area to detect agricultural partnership patterns in rural areas.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Assets, P., A. Barkley, E. Katungi, M. A. Ugen, and E. Birachi, "Public-private partnership generates economic benefits to smallholder bean growers in Uganda," Food Security., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 201–218, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s12571-022-01309-5.
Astaman, P., A. R. Siregar, M. Munizu, and Hastang, “Risk identification of Bali Cattle on traditional farming: A review,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 807, no. 3, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/807/3/032089.
Awad, M. H. (2023). Place and the Structuring of Cross-Sector Partnerships: The Moral and Material Conflicts Over Healthcare and Homelessness. Journal of Business Ethics, 184(4), 933–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05360-w
Ditcham, W. G. F., J. R. Lewis, R. J. Dobson, N. Hartaningsih, G. E. Wilcox, and M. Desport, “Vaccination reduces the viral load and the risk of transmission of Jembrana disease virus in Bali cattle,” Virology, vol. 386, no. 2, pp. 317–324, Oct. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2009.02.008.
Dubie, T., F. H. Abegaz, B. Dereje, W. Negash, and M. Hamid, “Seroprevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Lumpy Skin Disease of Cattle in Selected Districts of Afar Region, Ethiopia,” Vet. Med. Res. Reports, vol. 13, pp. 191–199, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.2147/vmrr.s375273.
Dwinata, I. M., I. B. M. Oka, K. K. Agustina, and I. M. Damriyasa, “Seroprevalence of Neospora caninum in local Bali dog,” Vet. World, vol.11, no. 7, pp. 926–929, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2018.926-929.
Gerken, K.N.., "Exploring potential risk pathways with high-risk groups for urban Rift Valley fever virus introduction, transmission, and persistence in two urban centers of Kenya," PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis., vol. 17, no. 1, p. e0010460, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1371/journal. and.0010460.
Graham, S., and R. Davis-Floyd, “Indigenous Midwives and the Biomedical System among the Karamojong of Uganda: Introducing the Partnership Paradigm,” Front. Sociol., vol. 6, p. 670551, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.670551.
Hammami, P., S. Widgren, V. Grosbois, A. Apolloni, N. Rose, and M. Andraud, “Complex network analysis to understand trading partnership in French swine production,” PLoS One, vol. 17, no. 4, p. e0266457, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266457.
Hastang, H. et al., “Analysis of Beef Marketing Channels in Makassar City Slaughterhouses, South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia,” J. Adv. Zool., vol. 44, no. 02, pp. 133–136, 2023, [Online]. Available: http://www.jazindia.com/index.php/jaz/article/view/460/172%0A
Holt, D. H., Højlund, H., & Jensen, H. A. R. (2021). Conflict and synergy in health promotion partnerships: a Danish case study. Health Promotion International, 38(4), daab189. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daab189
Hubeis, M. “Beef Cattle Development Strategy in the Bali Cattle Development Area of Barru District,” Manaj. IKM J. Manaj. Pengemb. Ind. Kecil Menengah, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 48–61, 2020.
Khan, W., S. Khan, A. Dhamija, M. Haseeb, and S. A. Ansari, “Risk assessment in livestock supply chain using the MCDM method: a case of emerging economy,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 20688–20703, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23640-2.
Munoz-Jofre, J., S. Hinojosa, A.-L. Mascle-Allemand, and J. Temprano, “A selectivity index for public-private partnership projects in the urban water and sanitation sector in Latin America and the caribbean,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 335, p. 117564, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117564.
Okello, I., E. Mafie, G. Eastwood, J. Nzalawahe, L. E. G. Mboera, and S. Onyoyo, “Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of African Animal Trypanosomiasis in Cattle in Lambwe, Kenya,” J. Parasitol. Res., vol. 2022, p. 5984376, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/5984376.
Pradiptya Ayu Harsita & Amam, “Gaduhan: Partnership System of Smallholder Cattle Farming Business in East Java r,” J. Peternak. Sriwij., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 16–28, 2021.
Rohani, S., A. R. Siregar, T. G. Rasyid, I. M. Saleh, M. Darwis, and P. Astaman, “Socio-economic factors of farmers in implementing the profit-sharing system in beef cattle business,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 888, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/888/1/012084.